Voted in by people2.

On Monday, we presented our 253-unit townhome Planned Unit Development (PUD) to the City Commission and received a favorable 4/5 vote!

I love how this 7 month old thread suddenly became popular again and got me a fresh 50 votes. 

You don’t have to research very far to see the widespread housing trends toward more micro-apartments, co-housing situations, and all the other ways people are voting with their rent dollar in wanting a better value proposition at the affordable end of the rental spectrum.Vacancy for an SRO can be kept quite low, and the density results in a very high cashflows compared to the same square footage of a triplex or 6-unit down the street.Utilities bills are marginally higher with the SRO, because there is no incentive for tenants to conserve.

We have done a FOIA on the voting records. 

Another vote for all the same firm - I have never actually seen a client divide up work based on CPAs in different states for different projects. 

In that case, I would vote for you to refinance at a lower LTV (~80%) to ensure you are breakeven/some small cash flow at a minimum.

Need all of you to move to Glenwood, Iowa before the election and vote.

To keep up with updates, I follow different Twitter and Facebook posts such as local news reporters and the news channels themselves that update on council meetings and voting.

Thank you,Nirav Since you already pulled the trigger...and are a limited partner...this means you have the benefits of that (i.e. no liability beyond your investment) in exchange for generally having no ability to vote or have a say in how the investment is managed.