[SPAM REMOVED]

The property was worth $400,000.Interest is 12%.I am researching some others.I also have an attorney that worked for taxing entities to assist me if I ever end up with a problem, ie. tenants to evict.I have a synopsis I typed up with a bit more explanation if you would like me to email it to you - no spam.

Basicaly your saying  put more in at a lower rate of return and then gamble on appreciation??  

As far as risks, I'd rather take the 10 years of certain cash flow with moderate appreciation over gambling on equity increases.

No, because a) that might be their luxury/vice item for all I know, which is 100% fine if it's viewed as a luxury item that they just really personally enjoy and gain happiness from (it's much less harmful than other vices, like drugs or gambling!)

It's a little bit of a gamble for both of you, but I think a fair one. 

Hopefully during that time the house appreciates (always a gamble and never guaranteed). 

You can have a cash-flowing property that has a loss for tax purposes, primarily due to the effects of depreciation (a non-cash expense).If you have a negative cash flowing property, then your only financial benefit as an investor is the gamble on property appreciation.

I know I’m ignoring any appreciation, but I hear over and over again not to count on appreciation because that’s a gamble.

It could appreciate but I consider that gambling.