data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c43a4/c43a4469be0b1ed61aec741a751350bf7a725107" alt=""
27 July 2019 | 2 replies
@Sathish SekarI have a 5 flat, (financed as a 4 with a non conforming basement apartment) that I refinanced as an investment property because it had appreciated to over 20% equity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0907d/0907d38a4eee146dd2de4575c413f0fc95a5bfbc" alt=""
29 July 2019 | 1 reply
@Jackson Pontsler - There really isn't a case to make, DTI is a conforming guideline and you must meet the requirements to get a conforming loan.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb1f1/bb1f19bef2041cafef28e1b1edb20d33203b4319" alt=""
29 March 2019 | 0 replies
Are there any lenders that can provide a leasehold mortgage that is also a conforming mortgage for a project in San Diego county?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63c18/63c184f68a78f064e7b706117929d09152982f21" alt=""
2 April 2019 | 4 replies
With conventional financing (which conforms to Fannie/Freddie guidelines), most lenders are limited to 75% LTV for cash out refinances on 1 unit investment properties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e17/a4e1725d1192cc6bfa387fd55bc7c993e5c60150" alt=""
2 April 2019 | 11 replies
For a "conforming" (fannie mae or freddy mac backed) loan, there is a 6 month minimum ownership requirement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1a0/7a1a0516e638d9b3f429d510ba12d68a4010209e" alt=""
2 April 2019 | 3 replies
We bought at the right price, were able to get legal non-conformance for use as a tri-plex when only a duplex was permitted and will improve the property even more by painting, re-exposing original architecture, adding laundry facilities, and increasing the rents to market value.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31064/31064ffe397707df1fe52526d414e8ad593fd9c9" alt=""
2 April 2019 | 1 reply
legal conforming 2 family house
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1b7d/f1b7da4baeff68c88f8e37404fd9ef864caf78be" alt=""
9 April 2019 | 25 replies
The difference is in the kind of representation you get.A sharp buyer's agent would never have let you pay $500 to get the seller to conform to the contract terms - or let you present an offer with the 3-day overstay, unless there was proper protection for you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bb93/4bb939b100f54127aeb553f7bd75597faf14bbb5" alt=""
6 April 2019 | 10 replies
If you do, don’t waste time trying to get your current PM to conform but find another ASAP.