data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/461e9/461e96efefac6768e667e1e2b4e326dd8c3b8ded" alt=""
1 October 2024 | 4 replies
Of the fifty agents that you used to work with - did they ever have to come in to the office or was an office not really necessary in order to function at a higher capacity?
4 October 2024 | 26 replies
@Jill Hutsonthree reasons why apartments don't rent: Condition, Price, and Marketing, and a fourth can be the leasing agent, although I would tend to lump that into marketing.If the house is in good shape, and you're on all the platforms marketing it, then it's a function of price.There has been an oversupply of new inventory coming on line in many markets, and that's why rents have dropped in a lot of the metros.Unfortunately, it appears you have a pricing issue and you may have to start reducing the price, or throwing in some type of concessionGood luckGino
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec005/ec005153bb668a0c42c5cc197b149008299c7fd7" alt=""
4 October 2024 | 11 replies
:Class A Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+ (roughly 5% probability of default), zero evictions in last 7 years.Class B Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680 (around 10% probability of default), some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 yearsClass C Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4c3e/a4c3ea74d275f41cddcdaa48987926a5cf2d368a" alt=""
1 October 2024 | 5 replies
The next buyer brought in an engineer who had over 20 years experience with older residential homes in Denver and said, "yeah, it's not perfect and certainly not to current code but it will likely continue to function as it has for the past 80 years."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaf0b/eaf0baa39498928c0a072f2d3ab8aca35c594037" alt=""
7 October 2024 | 20 replies
Then you have wiped the slate clean on the loss carryforwards, that $200k of released loss carryforwards offsets ordinary income first - so you will actually get a great result.Then, in 2025, when you have no more pass loss carryforwards, consider making that real estate professional status aggregation election, and utilizing cost segregation on properties you acquired in a prior year.Of course all of this - get some real tax help, I'm just another guy on the internet here, and there should be a deeper dive on the circumstances than what you can get through a forum posts to ensure this all actually works properly in your situation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ff98/9ff98032d3928387a1816419a1fde16589f0cc72" alt=""
4 October 2024 | 4 replies
:Class A Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+ (roughly 5% probability of default), zero evictions in last 7 years.Class B Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680 (around 10% probability of default), some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 yearsClass C Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82c5e/82c5e0ad925b73fd6446861daa37de7c91eaf77b" alt=""
3 October 2024 | 2 replies
Having your handyman do showings could be a solution, but keep in mind that if he’s not experienced in tenant screening, it could expose you to more risk, especially with squatters or less reliable tenants.You mentioned using something like Showmojo for smart access, which is great for efficiency, but I’d suggest ensuring you have solid procedures for background checks and tenant screening if you go that route.As someone who’s owned a property management company for 5+ years and manages over 300 units, I’ve seen the impact of not properly screening tenants.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d94fa/d94fa0b2da1ce7567d056a3dc2b2be167263a49d" alt=""
4 October 2024 | 9 replies
Unless there is another person able to provide income and you can properly screen them, we would deny them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d89b2/d89b2fbf5eb8f6a8e3a847a97f92a01ed824fad1" alt=""
2 October 2024 | 24 replies
They are both fruits, but very different.High cash value life insurance is not an investment, but when used properly it can turbo charge your investments.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d07da/d07dad86769cc9a3a4f74f81e46f8517f5bd3eb8" alt=""
3 October 2024 | 3 replies
It can be mitigated with the proper agreement.