It was my belief that I would own 2/15 of the property at this time.  

You could get all fancy and stuff with the wrap-arounds and the subject to's and all of these other clever tricks to hide that you are taking over the home but contrary to popular belief, lenders aren't stupid, and i've seen too many accelerations for transfer without written lender approval to do so, to think otherwise.

I had a belief (a prejudice) along the lines of exactly what you said.

So in the event we didn't think of every contingency, it's our belief that a judge could look over this document, ask us questions as to our intent, likely infer the intent in the document and make a ruling based on it.That's our hope, anyways.Is this the best legal way to go about it?  

It was a comment that your inner beliefs and assumptions may be holding you back.  

My former jobs were as a butcher/manager in the restaurant I own, rehabbing and flipping properties (I had a contractors and real estate agent license) and selling religious goods for a company in Italy (I speak Italian and would sell to churches in the midwest).

I track my stuff religiously now because we seek spec loans pretty frequently.  

Truth be told I would love to get in that sweet spot where I realize annual losses after depreciation.My plan here is, and I am confirming my belief with some more marked due diligence, is to get into the park with no money down and to add value by increasing rents slowly and consistently, renting vacant lots, and adding homes and getting them rented. 

Sometimes its our own beliefs that cause these issues.Best of luck and feel free to reach out to me if you have any more questions!

I'm of the belief that one is overdue in my area, so I would like at the very least like for my next investment to be of a safer variety if this does occur.