However I dont think any of those things is actually good for lead creation.

I was and am instrumental in its creation but I don't own it, others do who support it with their time and talents.

I'am seeing lots of job creation in my area due to all the tech start-ups and constructionmbut province wide we don't look to be growing as fast as we should to support any other province when the time comes, since we can no longer ride the Alberta oil cash cow.Alberta is really going down!

I think it is a much more stable and proven method to wealth creation. 

This is what I've posted in previous postings:You can either become a hard money lender yourself, which requires starting a company, website creation, legal assistance, program creation all to find yourself marketing a product that you have possibly little experience in, and potentially losing money for awhile . . .

You'll figure out what area is growing rapidly from job creation.  

Value add by reducing property taxes, property insurance, utility bills, and additional expenses with increasing rents etc. is a possibility.It's a very different form of value creation versus buying something that is already stabilized and most of the value is extracted from it already.In that case you have to be more conservative on the numbers as you are buying mostly the cash flow with little to no additional upside avenues.300 per unit upside spread per unit sounds good.

@Vy MaiThe vanity model # is 204660769 or the link is http://www.homedepot.com/p/Water-Creation-Madison-60-in-Vanity-in-Modern-White-with-Marble-Vanity-Top-in-Carrara-White-MADISON60W/204660769?

Risk tolerance, their age, wealth preservation or creation mode, do they want to add anymore money then what they initially thought etc.I don't know if a type of investment might be a fit for somebody until I talk with them. 

You are correct in that when a seller does agree to allow other property to substitute on the collateral a separate mortgage document is drafted where the original seller (dare I say lender) agrees again to the terms of the original note with a new property serving as collateral.I do disagree with your assertion: "Loans purposely do not contain these types of clauses as that would lead to the exact idea you are trying to skirt which is never paying the loan off and transferring the secured interest of the note to new property. " If you have a 15-year mortgage note that a Seller has agreed to create and the underlying property is being refinanced within a 2-year period of that note's creation, to collateralize the note with another property - how does this equate to never paying of the loan?