If this is the case you make and it is untrue it is arguably fraudulent.

I currently live in the Ninth Circuit, which is arguably the most liberal of all them.

I know it seems like it would make it easier if you put 50% down, but that isn't necessarily the case (and arguably maybe not desirable...). 

Despite their claims of being an honest and family-oriented company, they are simply representative of the less-than-forthright business that they are a part of.To be clear, they did nothing illegal, but the entire process is set up for them to back out of the contract at the last minute, which they did to us, the day before we were supposed to close.Theyoffered me a price for our home which was significantly below (arguably 20-25% below) market value.

I can say where I wouldn't look, and that's arguably 95%+ that are selling such programs.

So your underlying asset is likely not going to meet average appreciation levels(which is arguably the #1 wealth creator), and you have high(er) tenant to tenant risk (turnover, quality, etc.) which erodes cash flow.

Or would you consider the other buildings in the neighborhood - which, arguably, are not similarly set up?

Electronic transfers are arguable.

Arguable of course, but smart investors are looking at IRR and CoC in addition to cashflow.

Plus HomeUnion charges fees unnecessarily to work with them (plenty of companies out there do the same thing, and arguably better, and don't charge anything for it).