Question regarding buying an investment property in CA which was used as a grow house in pastKnown things so far - Growing was done in one room of the house, seller claims it has been cleaned up completely.

I got into a mobile home on 3 acres in suburb of Tulsa ok, the owner quit claimed deed to me and we signed a contract that I would rehab and sell at that time he gets $60,000.

I even had two people claim to be licensed in certain areas that in fact they were not and could not even pull a permit... not to mention they were not even properly credentialed for major things like electrical and plumbing. 

For example, I often see Buyers purchase property thinking there is a $1,000 deposit but then the tenant claims it was $2,000 because they paid the last month's rent.

So regarding the distance rule, I found early that it was 50 miles from your primary if you are going to be depreciating the property and claiming deductions if renting it.

Paid out-of-pocket in payments and completed a Quit Claim Deed, plan to build another small rental on the same property.

To me, that means you don't it and have as much claim to it as I do to my neighbor's property.I lived in a community in PA that had a deed restriction blocking construction of sheds and other things on all of the nearly 400 properties in the community.

Having a good sanitation system, and a city that cares about having a clean environment would be a great start.Unfortunately, after contacting the city and local groups that claim to want to make the city a beautiful place do not want to help put up a public trashcan.My last resource is contacting SEPTA and asking them.

I am at the point where I am going to call my credit card and file a claim. 

Also, for people claiming insurance here, I would strongly suggest against it unless you cannot come up with the funds to pay for this repair.