I worded it incorrectly: yes, should the Option Term run out, the tenant/buyer does not get their Option Consideration back.

@John CollinsYou are incorrect, the opposite is true, In some states it's illegal to divulge a a property sold price without the sellers .permission.

As the divorce settlement is through he is trying now to get the house deeded in his name.I agreed to 362 as-is, but the CL100 and the incorrectly disclosed AC + contract holdup?

If my math is incorrect please let me know....I am perfectly fine with being proven wrong.  

Hi,I recently transferred the title of a California property from a C-Corp of which I own 100% of the shares to my and my wife's individual names.I was advised that the transfer would not trigger a property tax reassessment based on the fact husband and wife are considered an economic unit and the transfer would not be considered a "change in ownership" since 100% of the property ownership would be transferred from me through the C-Corp to me and my wife.Next thing I know I received a notice of supplemental assessment dating from the title transfer date.Was I incorrectly advised or should I contact the Assessor's Office to plead my case?

That being said, once we knew all of the quirks it was easy to weed out the tenants who could or could not succeed in that building. 

Now, they are moving out too early in the year to test if there is any damage to the piping due to incorrect closing.

When you sell one property the suspended carryover loss on all properties is released to be used against income up to the amount of capital gains.Others say that this is incorrect.

Your total expenses is definitely incorrect as you add the mortgage.. 

No significant debt, aside from a car payment.If this is the incorrect area to post please lead me to the right one, I'm excited to learn!