And if you aren't thinking of improved habitable system (technology) comparisons like toilet vs outhouse or a swamp cooler vs frigid air (both which are habitable but we are still willing to live with either) then you're comparing accessories.

I imagine for a distressed property I'd be looking at a "full 203K" and I read some real nightmare stories.Question #2 is whether anyone has ever rehabbed a SFR to include a legal accessory dwelling unit (In-Law- Apartment) in this area?

I just did a black four-piece kitchen for just at $1,500, which included tax and all of the accessories that must be purchased with the appliance for Lowes to install it.

I am taking him to Home Depot and asking him to help me make decisions on what flooring, paint, bathroom accessories, etc. to buy.  

I posted my situation in a general forum, but given that there are nuances in my decision specific to the SF market (and regulations) I thought I'd post here too: https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/88/topics/451...The in-law cottage is an accessory unit, which I believe prevents a rent control situation, but expert thoughts welcome!

Years back, I found it more economical for me to buy a house full of mid-range furniture and accessories (we have less than $15K invested) and use it flip after flip. 

David Denies, the leader in South American hunting, recently partnered with BOYT, the leader in shooting accessories and hunting clothing.

You may be thinking of ADU--Accessory Dwelling Unit.

These can be some jems that allow for upgrades to make it a duplex or a sfr with an accessory dwelling unit.

That bad enough... but its totally something else for that same criminal to go to a court and sue you to change your door locks, because he feels its too much work breaking in.... you enable enough people to knowingly and deliberately commit crimes and at some point you are liable to face criminal charges as an accomplice or accessory.