data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13a3d/13a3d54641bdc7e52314bd96df79a99c08e3d131" alt=""
4 May 2017 | 61 replies
I think stupidity should be punished just as equally as lying for the same outcome.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2e62/b2e62c88f67e92e07662783a615d72b3f5eb1e0f" alt=""
30 June 2017 | 36 replies
They have provided a perverse incentive for me not to improve these things, because I'm punished for doing so with increased assessment and no ammo for my protest.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e21e2/e21e29208295316663139f7c9d0003b2496d1174" alt=""
20 May 2017 | 1 reply
Eviction filings are called "unlawful detainers" in your neck of the woods.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7928b/7928ba6ccae9737a2407eb730f71bc76834e102e" alt=""
27 May 2017 | 37 replies
But from your response to me it is clear that you are probably after a little something else because she made you angry and you want her punished.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/919bf/919bf6dfc8a316aaa7d041ddce2cafbfdaeec3ce" alt=""
1 June 2017 | 4 replies
Otherwise....you might be creating an unlawful illegal duplex (problems w/ city and problems getting it financed, etc)Check zoning
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c95d/6c95d74fc6ad664e426c1ad14c55be3da4b62cbb" alt=""
5 June 2017 | 4 replies
“Drug-related illegal activity” means the illegal manufacture, sale, distribution, purchase, USE, or possession with intent to manufacture, sell distribute, or USE of a controlled substance (as defined in Section 102 or the Controlled Substance Act (21 U.S.C. 8002) or possession of drug paraphernalia.2.Resident, any member of the resident’s household or guest or other person under the resident’s control shall not engage in any act intended to facilitate illegal activity, including drug-related illegal activity, on or near the said premises.3.Resident or members of the household will not permit the dwelling to be used for, or to facilitate illegal activity, including drug-related illegal activity, regardless of whether the individual engaging in such activity is a member of the household.4.Resident or members of the household will not engage in the manufacture, sale or distribution of illegal drugs at any locations, whether on or near the dwelling unit premises, or otherwise.5.Resident, any members of the resident’s household, or a guest or other person under the resident’s control shall not engage in acts of violence, or threats of violence, including but not limited to the unlawful discharge of firearms, prostitution, criminal street gang activity, intimidation, or any other breach of the housing agreement that the other wise jeopardizes the health safety or welfare of the landlord, his agents, or tenants.6.VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE PROVISIONS SHALL BE A MATERIAL VIOLATION OF THE HOUSING AGREEMENT AND GOOD CAUSE FOR TEMINATION OF TENANCY.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b839c/b839cabc8850e1b6bed94cf97f17c48ae0bda065" alt=""
28 July 2017 | 7 replies
I signed Occupancy Certificate too and it stated Occupancy Fraud is investigated and it's punishable 1.000.000 $ fine and even jail time which freaked me out.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e934/2e93474c21347b5aaeec87daaa96d07d1b99dc8b" alt=""
31 July 2017 | 8 replies
If unreasonable, unlawful, etc that landlord has a LOT to lose.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8083/f808387f0f58961f1a3754c325e04fec63ead81d" alt=""
14 March 2019 | 8 replies
The sad thing is that they aren't punished or held accountable at all for their actions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28680/286808785cdc87bf453c058d795a35d985e9c817" alt=""
5 May 2017 | 7 replies
It's sole director would be removable at will by the president, and its budget would be controlled by Congress through the traditional appropriations process.The CFPB currently has expansive power to crackdown on what it considers "unlawful and abusive practices," can write regulations on the financial industry and is funded through the Federal Reserve.Panel Republicans lambasted the CFPB as an abusive threat to the economy and to constitutional separation of powers, while Democrats touted the more than $11 billion the agency returned to consumers through enforcement actions.Democrats offered several amendments to strip those provisions from the bill, which also fell along party line votes.Throughout the hearing, Democrats criticized Republicans for starting with a massive, 500-page bill combining bipartisan measures with long-sought GOP targets.Several asked Hensarling to abandon the CHOICE Act in favor over a bill focusing on community and mid-size banks.