They are simply taking the risk of loosing the earnest money and finding an in buyer with in the 45 days.

Which is a pretty loose definitely of "for the public good" that they are suppose to be able to condemn under.

One year tenancy should be enough to argue something in front of the judge.And then you could always gamble a bit: On one side, if it fails, you loose $100 or so filing fee and your time (if you go yourself to court).

There's a lot of fools putting people in harm's way by moving them in to units that have serious safety concerns, like loose hot wires, no smoke detectors, failing exhaust ducting and more.

I certainly don't want to loose her as a tenant...she pays, she takes care of property, she's clean.

That way the original two tenants are bound by the original agreement and the new tenant can enter for the remainder of the term.

I'm not afraid of loosing my job as much as seeing chains on the door knobs.

I've come to notice that with success in anything you loose things/people.

Trap all loose animals and turn into the humane society or animal control officers.

Not because I'm bound by a lease.Even though I put 30 days notice for tenants in the lease, if it comes down to it, I'll accept notice somewhat less than that.