What I do, is try to look at the worst case scenario.And it's my opinion, that in the worst case scenario I can think of - where some tenant says their kid or dog got sick from eating soil on your property, I could argue in court that there would be no reasonable expectation for me to "assume" that the property was unsafe - given the fact that the city gave the okay, and I have the documentation to prove it.I would be quite happy with that risk.You can drive yourself crazy over this one, wondering if even if you test the surface soil and find nothing, that there may be some mystery leak buried down in the soil that may somehow rise to the surface, only to end up in the mouth of some dirt-eating child...  

And if the judge says I need to pay you back, then I will.They'll probably start flapping their arms and waving their mystery lease around, but if you stay firm, I bet they'll back down. 

Please advise.Thanks,Brian I'm really sorry about your mystery dead relative, hon.  

You can't just write "It's a mystery" in the funding section.

if title company says, there are 4k in liens against the house and i decide i am ok with that burden and im willing to pay/negotiate purchase price, would i not be responsible if a mysterious 7800k judgement came out of the woodwork?

There's no mystery to it.Zillow and other sites pull in data from the MLS (not always... about 1/3) and public data.

How the Western half of the US operates is a complete mystery to me.  

Why these Pre-License Schools go over this so quickly in class has always been a mystery to me.  

No mystery to it.

Are the trillions of dollars that "disappeared" in 2008 mysterious going to be recovered?