data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f9b2/7f9b21db2256e74db2bbca2ea06148b266b78bb3" alt=""
15 January 2025 | 2 replies
I know hosts have included additional cleaning fees for violations as a deterrent.If none of these solutions work, you could look into completely independent HVAC systems for the two units, though that would be a bigger upfront investment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/766bc/766bc404e27b4929d22d536de80d7a9cf9e7b7ec" alt=""
14 January 2025 | 3 replies
Make sure it explicitly explains the process for termination if you are unhappy with their services, especially if they violate the terms of your agreement.3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c42ce/c42ce581300b1b88b53e0966458acc4f10b9f9d8" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 10 replies
Make sure it explicitly explains the process for termination if you are unhappy with their services, especially if they violate the terms of your agreement.3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb17e/bb17ee7e9af2473c74b5b00f403439cc5743a2ba" alt=""
18 January 2025 | 3 replies
If this is simply you not wanting to accept partial payments and the rent is current, stop accepting it - and send a Lease Violation/Notice of Quit for Non-Payment of Rent - and force the full rent to be paid per the lease or start eviction.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ecb6/9ecb6e2ef064ea91d04fb28ff2cf50def7b1305b" alt=""
22 January 2025 | 12 replies
It's in great school districts, so I just listed those in the ad in a neutral, factual manner, which I believe won't violate fair housing laws as long as I avoid implying a preference.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b08f/5b08fbdcccce4180a4ab5271fd6134424a12d4fd" alt=""
19 January 2025 | 27 replies
How do I go about evicting them if they are current on rent and unauthorized pet is the first violation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fde9/1fde92d0ab8964fd82ce7cfc6ca361812ea57269" alt=""
14 January 2025 | 23 replies
The "due on sale" clause (DoSC) obligates the seller to notify the lender if the property is sold.Failing to do so would place the seller in violation of this agreement, giving the lender the right to accelerate the loan.But no laws are being broken here.So, subto is neither legal nor illegal.Second, it only works because most lenders are more interested in receiving payments than in invoking the DoSC clause and foreclosing on the property.But, it can work, provided seller and buyer are both on board and the proper process is followed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d1f/d7d1f828dd05dd36c5bd9015e8a5b3d836a2e382" alt=""
20 January 2025 | 9 replies
One can not emphasize enough how unfortunate the work product investors receive is due to huge inconsistencies and other very unprofessional basic typos and SEC rule violations that open up investors up to huge liabilities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dda3/1dda3823695e88399ef74b06f7d880ea58f312a6" alt=""
17 January 2025 | 19 replies
This is an obvious fair housing law violation because you are choosing which prospect get the concession.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c785/6c785a9d5b182c1db256b10a24624760c7df7e79" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 11 replies
The law does NOT apply to landlords:With less then 5 rental unitsThat live in one unit of a duplex and rent out the other unitThat rent out rooms in the home they occupySo, landlords can no longer state in their rental ads, "Section 8 not accepted".The reverse is also true, "Section 8 only", cannot be used.We've always recommended screening S8 tenants the same way as cash-paying tenants.Landlords waiving application fees and/or security deposits only for S8 prospects may also be violating Fair Housing.