I’m presuming profiting as well.

I understand the argument that the general public should not be restricted from investing in “highly profitable” deals, but what tends to end up being offered to unaccredited, unsophisticated investors in the “junk” end of the investment spectrum. 

The one pro I see is it’s pretty hand off and can still make a profit.

Profits do not justify their effort even with the ADU addition in this case typically not being hands off .Here is a list of things that make ADU additions a less than optimal RE investment but the value added and starting with tens of thousands negative is a big one that needs to be well understood. 1) The value added by the ADU addition is often significantly less than the cost of adding the ADU.

The profitability is very depend on the lease you negotiate with the property owners.

They cost $800k+ though but well worth it when want investment that actually performs profitably.

You often only have to worry about tax upon the profitable sale of an asset. 

people in the street are dying becuase their company make less profit too, most small business in america can only survive by continous debt cycle.

Once the renovations are complete, the property might appeal to owner-occupants or investors, and you could potentially recoup your costs and free up capital for a more profitable deal.

Doing Build-4-Rent without all this, is GAMBLING not investing.