Here is the question: “You’re investing $10,000 in a deal that has three potential outcomes: 20 percent chance of tripling your money, 45 percent chance of breaking even, 35 percent chance of losing all your money.

There's only two outcomes.

What was the outcome?

Again looked really similar.. who knows what the outcome will be.

The doors windows appliances flooring ventilation hot water trim along with electrical wiring What was the outcome?

My math could be off so let me know how many actual appointments were set, met and what was the outcome.

In addition, the owner of the home must not own more than three single-family homes.3) They are unable to provide sufficient documentation, such as the emotional support animal letter, that verifies the ESA is necessary for their health and well-being.4) The tenant provides fraudulent documentation attesting to their need for an emotional support animal (usually a fake emotional support animal letter).5) The landlord can demonstrate that making accommodations for an ESA would impose undue financial burden or logistical burden. 6) The animal is destructive to the property or displays threatening behaviors that could put other tenants or yourself at risk.7) The size or nature of the animal makes it impossible to house safely or humanely.

If you turn the display to the Satellite display, those many hundreds of purple dots are spread out amongst literally 100,000s of homes in the area.

What was the outcome?

What was the outcome?