Are each of you bringing key components to the enterprise other than capital? 

I made this comment in some other forum but it applies here so I would like to receive your feedback on it directly in this thread.Passive (leasing) ranchland annual yield is 0.05%-2.5% depending on Location.Bozeman = 0.05%Carlsbad New Mexico = 2.5%The livestock enterprise profit margins should double that, thus taking one’s Net annual yield on all capital assets (cattle & equipment) to 5% (with immense risk behind that).The livestock operating entity may not be that compelling of an investment pitch without integrating the historical risk/return performance of rural land, though there are lease operators who are probably in the annual net profit margin of 10-15% (lean operators.)The intangible and “psychological” benefits do (subjectively) provide a higher annual yield; quality time with family, being in nature, hunting and recreation, freedom independence and diversity of one’s day/month/year.Does this make it a “lifestyle” business much like cupcakery and boutique pottery?

Paul LoRusso at JIL Enterprises, PA.

I just started a company called Andrews Enterprises, that specializes in wholesaling!

They do pretty similar things but zapier seems to be gaining a lot of momentum (especially in enterprise market) and integrate with lots of web services.

i now have 3 properties in the memphis area, 2 with "hardin enterprises" and one with "realty capital management". hardin enterprises im about 50% satisfied, and realty capital i havent been with long enough to say, but so far its about 85% satisfied. 

@Sammie BakerTry Enterprise Property Management.

This personal investment could come through a friendship ("I like you and want you to succeed"), through a common business enterprise ("We work for the same company and I want this company to succeed") or even something less tangible ("You remind me of my son and it makes me feel good to help you"). - A coach charges money -- this isn't to say that the coach doesn't have some vested interest in seeing you succeed (regardless of the continued payments), but it likely means that the coach makes some/all of his living doing this and can't afford to just give away his time. - There is absolutely nothing wrong with either model, assuming you get at least as much as you pay for (if you pay more than the value you get, then there's an issue).

Been doing it since 2003 and worked on multiple projects from start-up to enterprise level.

Running a simple stock screen for REITs and their enterprise value, only 5 out of 60 had an EV lower than $70m while 34 have an EV over $1.5b.