The police would "detonate in place" (meaning blow up the house) rather than take the risk of moving these dangerous items.

My personal experience shows just how dangerous lead removal activities can be.So what you think  Derreck? 

( that glove didn’t fit) next he will say Michael Jackson was dangerous around kids lol

Except that a newbie with a $500k inheritance entering into what is likely the tippy toppy point of the RE market cycle is a dangerous thing.

I believe we are in real danger of being overly regulated like Denver which will shut many investors and STR owners down so I'm asking any stake holder to keep an eye out and plan to attend the council meeting when it's announced and speak in favor of STR's. 

There's are whole streets of duplexes in my target area built like this.Small places like the ones I'm describing, the roof, gutters, and chimney aren't particularly dangerous or complex for a single skilled handyman with Craigslist helpers to replace and maintain very cheaply.

She sounds like a danger to herself and others.

/The reason it’s  dangerous is this: let’s say you put down 3.5% on a 195k property.

I'm slightly aware of the dangers of commingling retirement funds/personal funds.  

Obviously, there are less home buyers buying fourplexes rather than SFR or duplexes, but I'm not sure why the bank cares as long as it counts as a comparable unit.I'm not trying to sound contradictory, I just still haven't fully understood the distinction yet.