I know many of you are probably anti stock market and that's okay. 

Quote from @Jonathan R McLaughlin: @Zachary Inman yea, it has never been clear to me what problem the existence of crypto solves.And I believe the celebrities who made those commercials for it got paid in dollars :)Crypto is basically the anti-establishment movement.So they want the money to move from the old greedy pro-establishment institution to the new greedy anti-establishment institution lol :-)

Since this is your first rental and you'll be living there as an owner-occupant, you qualify for an exemption under FHA anti-discrimination laws.

Here is the list of the “dirty dozen” scams.Arrangements that are potentially abusive:Monetized Installment Sales: violation of anti-pledging lawsMaltese Treaty Benefits for Pensions: Misuse of treaty provisionsForeign Captive Insurance: abnormal pricing, implausible risks, the company has no business purpose for entering into the arrangementCharitable Remainder Annuity Trusts (CRATS): to eliminate taxable gainsFraud that is consumer focused:Anonymous Communications: Scammers with the intent of defrauding taxpayersOffer in Compromise (OIC) Mills: Companies that offer to settle your debt with IRS but leave you in a worse positionSpear Phishing: Pretending to be the IRSCOVID-Related Fraud: Identify theftHigh-Net-Worth ActivitiesHigh-Earner Failure to File: taxpayers with over $100k in income that fail to file tax returnsMicro-captive Insurance Arrangements: Nonexistent insurance coverageOffshore Accounts and Digital Assets: Hiding incomeSyndicated Conservation Easements: Unwarranted and inflated tax deductionsAs always, if something seems too good to be true, it most likely is.

I am not anti-PM but I am against the idea that managing a rental is so complicated that only a "professional" could do it for you.

In general, there is this huge "anti-permit" sentiment. 

Cash for keys is an awful technique unless you're in an area that is anti-Landlord.

Purchase price: $20,000 Cash invested: $115 Sale price: $25,000 Contributors: Cindy Carriger This house was owned by an elderly couple who had rented it to an "interesting" family that included one guy on anti-depressants, a Rottweiler, a pit bull, snakes, an iguana, and what looked like asbestos shingles on the exterior walls.

Is this an investor or business-facing publication that is genuinely interested in educating its audience and want to use info from real investors to do so or is this a publication with an anti-investor/anti-landlord bent looking to profile investors in a way that makes us look greedy and paint us as "responsible" for the housing crisis, rising home prices and rising rents?

Our government officials are playing whack-a-mole with the economy...they massively overstimulated it and now are aggressively anti-stimulating it.