@Chase GochnauerYes when it comes to mathematics, your right, the more leveraged you are, the greater chance you have of achieving more wealth.  

Furthermore, Bill Gates spent 2 years in Harvard taking advanced-level computer science and mathematics courses.

I love to have my thinking challenged.I mathematically proved that it would be best for me financially to sell my home and rent, but I have not done that.

It depends on the person and what return they can get on there money you can mathematically determine which route is best by doing a discounted cash flow analysis to compare the three strategies.

This is what is called independent events in mathematics.

However, if you run your numbers and you can invest in a property which returns equal to or greater than the interest on your student loans, it just makes mathematical sense.

So just think about it, any strategy taken by them has a distinct/significant advantage, mathematically/statistically/logistically over anything that the USA can possibly achieve in the realm of sequestering/mitigating/testing 300+ million.

This is no where close to being resolved, anyone who says this is a few week or in 2 months has a lack of understanding of;1. mathematically how fast this is spreading (0 cases 2/01 to 100k today 3/28) 2.

It is a mathematical certainty.It has been extremely difficult to have not made money investing in San Diego RE as my two poorly timed examples demonstrate. 

The 30k was just "invested" at a fixed rate return of whatever the mortgage rate it paid off was at.Now how everything ties in with the move and getting situated at the new job and all that, that takes it away from a pure mathematical/leverage situation, and is also very personal.