The condensed issue centers around decoupling of agent commissions, or no longer allowing seller's to pay the buyer's broker. 

However, in my market a nice unit can easily collect $120,000+ in rent (not taxes, fees, or other pass through costs) and when the locals demand 35% commission my 20% is a steal and isn’t a whole lot more work for the 25k+ a year I’m making per property.

I hire a college graduate in mathematics, who has a sense of humor, can pass rigorous background check, has perfect credit, and has desire to learn sales. 2. no mortgage company gives free leads3. mortgage loan officers do not get salaried, we are 100% commission.

My brokerage lets us keep 100% of the commission for one property we buy or sell ourselves every year.

The 8% fee is more or less just a commission that they'll make for applying for cards for you.

However, a recent change in their commission structure became a point of contention.

Agent doesn't get commission after working with buyer for 2 years.

Plus the sellers paid her commissions.

Should I create a separate management company through another LLC and pay it a standard commission, or should I operate it under the existing LLC that owns the units to avoid the complexities of setting up a new LLC structure?

This really confusing the way it's written, but typically you would have a commission agreement between you and the closer.