However, it is unlawful to discriminate against families with children, except in certain qualified housing developments intended specifically for older persons, which may be allowed to exclude children.For more information on Housing Discrimination,

CODE §30-2-50, OBTAINING OR USING PUBLIC RECORDS FOR COMMERCIAL SOLICITATION DIRECTED TO ANY PERSON IN THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IS UNLAWFUL, AND IS PUNISHABLE BY A FINE OF UP TO $500 AND IMPRISONMENT UP TO ONE YEAR, OR BOTH.The only paid lists we generate are through List Source.

It would be great if violated the constitution and we could sue the state or deem it unlawful?

If so, issue the appropriate notice to cure and if they don’t file an unlawful retainer against them for the boyfriend and his +1.

It is unlawful for any licensed real estate broker to retain, compensate, directly or indirectly, any person for performing any of the acts within the scope of this chapter who is not a licensed real estate broker, or a real estate salesperson licensed under the responsible broker retaining or compensating him or her, or to retain or compensate...

Id also expect DOJ to come down on it, as the issue is both about punishing such brokerage in an anticompetitive manor and as they are already under investigation for collusion on fixing commissions, thos decision plays right into DOJs hand.

This is all about old school brokerages attempting to punish a new on the scene competitor.

I would file an unlawful detainer with the aid of an attorney, and follow all rules for evictions/storing/notice of inventory/abandoned items.

Here's the whole section:"The following discriminatory housing practices shall be unlawful:...(11) To refuse to negotiate for the rental of a dwelling based on an individual’s rental history, unless the landlord can demonstrate that the rental decision was based on all information available, including consideration of the frequency and recentness of favorable and adverse rental history.  

My question is it seems like proceeding with an eviction (unlawful detainer) doesn't make sense as they've already vacated.