data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92a10/92a10ee2af64654351989241dc6c04d9dea3ccff" alt=""
14 January 2025 | 4 replies
Maybe sit down with her and look at the finances for her and if it makes sense for her to buy the X out and refinance if that is even possible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b731b/b731b4b938ee5d70e75854a28c25c6ed81020a21" alt=""
13 February 2025 | 12 replies
So now you need a development loan once you have your plans approved.. most folks that do land try for owner financing while they get approvals then go for 3p loan once you have an approved project or JV with cash partners.. thats what I do I am a JV cash partner no loans I dont need loans to do these land deals..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f7eb/1f7eb1695bb87dc6dc12219e7a0b750cb70fbf06" alt=""
15 January 2025 | 39 replies
Recognize due to the leverage that is possible with RE, the return from appreciation is magnified.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50ae7/50ae768b51b45f42b5764bd07b2a8987d63639c6" alt=""
4 January 2025 | 1 reply
Here is some key information:Property recently hit the market and has 2 cash offers alreadyThe seller provided a pre-inspection report, which I shared with 2 different lenders, both think it may fail conventional financing due to potential structural and electrical issues (realtor thinks it could pass conventional)Seller has 100% equity but is behind on other payments (not sure of the urgency money is needed)This is my first attempt at an “investment” property so I’m new to thisI see 3 optionsMove forward with an offer using conventional loan pre-qualification-Not as attractive of an offer to the seller-Possibility that appraiser calls out structural/electrical issues that need to be fixed before closing, effectively causing financing to fail- Best terms and fewest loan fees for meUse a rehab style loan such as ChoiceRenovation-Even less attractive than a conventional offer to seller, but less risk of failed financing if appraiser calls out issues-Slightly worse fees and interest rates compared to conventional-Lenders tell me possibly up to 60-90 days closing in some cases, with red-tape for contractor requirements and draw schedules (sounds like the most hoops to jump through during rehab)Use a hard money lender-Most attractive loan option I can give to seller so I can compete-Much higher fees and interest rate for me-need to refinance into a conventional at the end of rehab (not familiar with seasoning periods but I think this is a factor as well)Which option would you do?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7ef7/d7ef7a9be3342a0b037240cb5e130cccf7f11a45" alt=""
28 January 2025 | 4 replies
Sounds like this could possibly be a Schedule C activity so keep self employment tax in mind.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac32d/ac32dd09be6cdd72cd49aa23e9403c52125bbe0a" alt=""
26 January 2025 | 5 replies
I recently came across an opportunity to help a builder with their financing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/742c4/742c44b7b4c38539273c40420b5d8a7450e555ec" alt=""
30 January 2025 | 62 replies
I don't see any possible way to accomplish this goal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce800/ce800dcfaa172c69b0356eafa15a7839451acb1f" alt=""
4 February 2025 | 10 replies
Quote from @Devin James: In one of our development projects, the City staff asked us to remove 40 units from our concept plan.This wasn’t requested by the City Commission at a formal hearing, it was the opinion of the staff.Our original concept already proposed fewer units than the current zoning would have allowed.Here’s what erasing 40 units means:- 40 fewer homes for buyers- Over $1M in lost profit for our team- Fewer tax dollars and impact fees that could’ve benefited the City’s infrastructure & servicesWe gotta get betterEveryone wants more affordable housing, but not everyone wants to do what it takes to achieve it we never listen to the recommending bodies. we move for city approvals and work closely. the other thing we do is keep going back to the same groups over and over and over and over every month on the same agenda and make very small reductions like 2% or 4% and that reduces and beats them down eventually they accept what you want. it's just before beating a dead horse. we keep tabling until they give us something we all agree on then we go to vote. in our city in columbus we have to get recommendations but that's our strategy. we used to come out as aggressive as possible. we typically study developments in the area and keep it very similar in terms of density. we have a track record of very controversial projects and litigation and not taking no as an answer. after a year of that haha I can tell you it's not worth it. now we are more relationship based and buying the right kinds of plots of land. if the numbers don't work on the front end don't do the development.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82252/82252eb5db5f49d07ea046e031357b1ab6057f3e" alt=""
29 January 2025 | 5 replies
Ask yourself: do I really have the knowledge of real estate principles, real estate law and real estate finance; the network of contacts; the experience both in business in general and real estate in particular; the time available; and the analytical ability to compete against FULL TIME EXPERIENCED PROFESSIONALS to be successful in a field where the failure rate is so astronomically high?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21c3b/21c3b31e330d95769af0fa51e984f4bb4aa71047" alt=""
12 January 2025 | 6 replies
Hopefully, try to get as much as possible for your nonprofit.