These throw off income to the management LLCs from profits above preferred return distributions and acquisition/disposition fees earned on the assets in each fund's portfolio.

Here is how we do it on smaller deals.We have limited members contributing equity and managing members putting the deal together, managing it all the way to disposition and provide personal guarantee on the loan on smaller loan amounts.

Regarding whether or not a claimant can go after the husband as a single member, the fact that XYZ owns ABC has only some bearing on claimant's ability to go after the husband, but is not dispositive.

You need a development and disposition agreement that will give you power of attorney to be able to be the responsible party.

With larger, commercial. properties (say a 100 unit apartment complex), it also frequently makes sense to encapsulate them in their own business from both an operations, and eventual disposition, perspectives.To decide whether (when when) a holding company makes sense in your personal situation, you would be best served to review your real estate objectives (near and mid term) and your present financial position (income, assets, debts) with an accountant who has real estate experience.Hope this helps a little.

If you can get that done I think it all becomes a much more attractive project - without it you're severely limiting the market for disposition (which the banks care about quite a bit, in the event you get foreclosed on and/or pass away.)Good Luck James!

They also charge a 3% disposition fee - similar to many deals I have seen.

Having solid policies and procedures in place for unpaid rent, lease violations, or security deposit disposition will protect you more than an LLC.Here's the reality: can anyone name one single investor that was successfully sued for a large enough amount that they lost the investment property?

Hello I’m looking to get into the disposition side of real estate.

Each partner brings something to the table.Example: The equity partner owns vacant land and has the funds to develop the land, but doesn't have the construction or developement background.The other partner has experience in development/construction, repositioning and dispositions.50/50 might be to large of a risk as there is no incentive for the contractor to put foward his best effort.If I had this opportunity I would set it up where I would get an preferred return of 8% and a 75/25 split.Have the contractor also add funds into the project for materials and labors. and having all the terms spelled out and agreed to before forming the partnership.A suggestion on setting up the partnership payout.http://www.ccim.com/cire-magazine/articles/splitting-profits