There is definitely a healthy level of transparency and friendliness, that we may be able to have this discussion.I'll give this more thought how to approach this.  

It is better to be transparent so we investors can see a real track record.If anything, the above shows how portals can drop the ball when their focus is raising money. 

With all due respect, if you have been financing for 14 years you would realize that you have just advised someone to commit FRAUD.The silent second needs to be subordinated and transparent to the 1st lien holder or it's FRAUD.

Tax payers do not want to see tax dollars wasted so HUD needs to make sure the process is fair and transparent.

At the same time those who are willing to learn and to deal with the risks in one way or another can make money investing in RE in the US as in many other countries.Compared to the UK the US system is more transparent and it is easier to determine the values.

I always try to be very transparent about what information I will be gathering, who I'm gathering it from and how and when I'll be making a determination and I put the everything in writing.That way, no one can come back and say I discriminated against them or broke the law in a certain way because my policies were in writing and followed.

You can do so for more transparency but if you trust the other party or they trust you, it shouldn't be an issue.They would just write me a check for my cut once everything was said and done and then issue the 1099.

Be Transparent and Clear to All Parties.

I suggest going to a REIA meeting and discussing with leadership.Be transparent to all parties in the transaction and you should be okay.

Invest in Performing notes not sure if we have any other options like PPR with the same transparency and easiness to start (?)