From everything I've read, this should be covered by a landlord insurance policy that covers damage done by tenants (specifically, this tends to be categorized as Vandalism because the tenant is knowingly doing damage to your property).Here are some photos of the aftermathtldr; A tenant smoking meth cost my colleague over $25,000.The key takeaways here I believe are: 1) get a good insurance policy, being stingy might cost you years worth of profit, 2) screen your tenants well and inspect frequently (especially for lower class properties), and 3) be prepared for unexpected costs, this might be a rarer case but **** happens.Also I'm not a lawyer or insurance expert so you should consult professionals with regards to your state laws and local insurance policies to figure out how to cover yourself from a situation like this.I'm interested to hear if any of you have had to deal with something similar and also any suggestions you might have.

@Alexander Hamilton mail them until they tell you to stop. no more frequently than once a month.

i'm not sure the best way to get good answers is to insult your audience...

In my experience, Jonathan can take RDU Broker to a recommendable level by: (1) Investing in client expectation setting; (2) Setting resident/property check-ins on regular intervals & after critical weather; (3) Moving the self-service portal to more frequent updates.In the beginning, I hoped to experience a great relationship with RDU Broker.

It is unfortunate that you offered them a new lease recently so all that you can do is frequently inspect the property since you can’t trust them to notify you of needed repairs.

@Brett K.Not really a matter of how big/small the contact list is, as much as it is how frequently that data changes, or how many data sets someone is trying to piece together. 

We all know buyers frequently site things like "inspection", "neighborhood review" etc as a reason to kill a contract, even when that's not the real reason.I just think it's not right to totally negate the risk of a buyer losing EM, EM is a required element for good reason. 

Interesting that the HAR listing comment says off-duty cop there frequently... not a great sign of what's going on, but at least it seems they're trying to address the issue.https://www.trulia.com/p/tx/houston/12627-ashford-...

The money you save by less frequent turnovers will beat the money you would earn by trying to stay at top of market pricing. .

My experience as a one time squadron legal officer and frequent renter is that when a military member moves, they often refer another to your place.