I haven't had someone misunderstand me because I always say "100% financing of the loan and rehab costs, requiring you to bring much less to the closing table" and then proceed to explain lender fees, insurance, and title fees that are due at closing. :) 

. - we could bring less then $50,000 cash to the table. 

They ultimately walked away because this fund requires "a seat at the table" with key decision authority on when the asset can be sold or refi'd.  

Or when I lived in Palo Alto same thing  East palo alto schools and values were 1/3  all in the same area and same size homes. 

Would all traditional loan options be on the table?

Would this not reduce the number of potential buyers brought to the table when the realtor can't use the largest marketing platform to its full advantage (aka the MLS)?

However it could be location,  Common area, size, laundry, tenant qualifications (in rough areas you are not going to get many tenants with unblemished credit), parking, look of surrounding properties, etc.   

The homes are reasonably priced for the size and bones, allowing investors to customize homes with renovation or interior design prior to being able to attract guests at the right price.

At an event, one of them wouldn't leave me alone while I was trying to eat and network with the others at the table.

No formula can be accurate across the board because even “cookie cutter” properties next store to each other differ as to view, location to the street, topography of the land, lot size, physical condition of the property, past remodeling, quality of the mechanical systems, sunlight, utility bills, past use, etc.