16 March 2021 | 4 replies
I would go with the first person that applied and qualified/passed screening and i would dbl check local laws to ensure how you are to process applications (usually in the order received and you dont charge them for background check until you get to them) this will protect you from discrimination complaints and is what is usually recommended or legislated.
21 March 2021 | 19 replies
It is critical that housing providers are engaged with the current legislative process!
25 January 2021 | 1 reply
It is possible they extend it in future legislation, but the COVID relief act they just passed (COVIDTRA) does not extend the original CARES Act provision.
25 January 2021 | 0 replies
That’s where the Pier desperately needs legislative support.
2 December 2021 | 7 replies
@Ben Lue If its older then I doubt that it's a unit that was legalized under the recent "ADU" legislation.
27 February 2021 | 126 replies
Except perhaps our state legislators better wake up if they want to stop this mass exodus.
27 March 2021 | 74 replies
This is the kind of stuff that gets lawmakers eager to legislate.
26 July 2021 | 25 replies
Legislators have essentially made finding a place to stay for borderline tenants nearly impossible.
9 February 2021 | 60 replies
So back east this is quite popular in non appreciating states.. where the owners want to off load the burden of tax's insurance and maintenance on the property to the buyer.. there have been abuses on this model so there has been some new legislation mainly making sure your buyer has the ability to carry through Dodd Frank rules apply etc.
31 March 2021 | 16 replies
Certainly good to know to keep an eye on our Idaho legislators who start pushing this type of agenda!