From my observation, if you don't manage your own properties, there's little to no profit.

I do not know how the two may overlap and I can only comment on what I've observed in the Philadelphia market, but if the Philadelphia values I've seen in past social media posts and the limited financials available through their filings pertain to REIT owned assets, I can't foresee a scenario where the investors receive anywhere close to the share prices in the event the entire portfolio were liquidated. 

Just some observations as I don't work in this space.

My wife and I decided to move to our land in South Texas and I was able to observe the problem up close and came to embrace the vision of the National Association of Area Agencies on Aging.

There was also a failing retaining wall in the rear of the property that completely blocked natural light form a handful of houses, and was technically on the property line and a shared responsibility.

It's something I have been observing more and more.

You would pay us corporate tax rate, but the retained earnings could remain in the company and not be repatriated to Canada.If you are moving to the U.S.A. and will not be keeping a presence in Canada, then once you move you should not be paying Canadian tax on your world-wide income.

Developers and interim owners have for decades retained these rights when selling the rest of the real estate in case oil is ever struck a la Beverly Hillbillys.

This is s good observation.

I have been trying to avoid the coaching programs (limited capital) but it seems like I might need one if (and/or)  not a lawyer on retainer to sort  through it all.