Your tenants obligation was to pay you on Jan 1, so it doesn't matter if they paid someone else they still owe you...obviously details re: notice and dates all come into play here and from a practical perspective I'd work with the tenant and not move to evict over this.

I don't know if you've played around with the feature request portal (it's under Help and Support in the top right, then Suggest a Feature).

I am also curious about when/how an attorney/legal involvement comes into play with this.

Is this ultimately a land play? 

The theory is spot on, in practice however that logic rarely plays out - at least in recent years where multifamily has been crazy.

I think new investors who post here and take all the feedback as a whole, with a grain of salt, can really put it into play in real life and then discuss with investors at meetups in their area to get over the hump.

FHA is unlikely to play nice in this situation.Bank statement loans might be an option for you.

If first time home buyers are having a difficult time coming up with the funds for even the costs to play as a first time home buyer then are the non profits supposed to pay the buyers agent commission too? 

The Private Equity and Institutional investor is playing the ADU game - I’m working with them.

This plays into the affordability issues for tenants by allowing them to live in nicer neighborhoods for less money, yet I get monthly revenue comparable to short-term rentals.