In the past five years, I’ve picked up 20 more properties using BRRRR, plus some subject-to deals, wraparounds, novations, and JVs.

This California law eliminates much of the red tape by bypassing environmental reviews and subjective local approvals, creating a faster and more predictable development process.

Distributions have been catching up but redemptions won't resume until all distributions have been caught up.

And because it’s a logistics hub (FedEx HQ, major distribution centers, and growing industries), rental demand stays strong.I’ve been in Memphis my whole life and have spent over two decades helping investors navigate this market and build profitable rental portfolios here.

Not only that, but it is unoccupied and subject to any number of things happening to it while it is unoccupied simply put, it just does not seem worth it to try to haggle over a raise like this. however, if you are in a high demand area with your property, and you know that it has a lot of value, you could post an ad to try to get some feelers out for occupancy and if you find something better, as far as quality and price for the occupant, then you can consider the lengthy eviction process, but again you're doing all of this for about $200 extra and none of it seems worth it.

I would consult an attorney who specializes in this.Also, assuming the property is in California, if it wasn't subject to CA Rent Control, once it goes into the LLC, it might be.

Here was one of the highlights "if a landlord knows that a property is subject to flooding, then they must share that information with potential tenants prior to signing the lease agreement.

The entrance near Mariposa is more subject to rockslides and gets closed more often.

Also if you get signed up for Pro it locks you in at that price and you are not subject to further price increases.

Also, I am thinking of investing into real estate via a new Self Directed Roth Solo 401K account due to tax free distributions after age 59 1/2 instead of SEP IRA, any thoughts?