Then they realize it didn't and they need to find a new way to make money to keep the real estate investing going.  

Apologies - I hadn't realized you had cross-shopped between AgSouth and Vystar for the same loan prod. 

I realize this may not be a strong enough reason if the market dynamics have shifted.As for California, my interest lies in the fact that I live here.

We (developer and all of us as consultants) were sued over this PE three years later, which I mostly believe is because they realized they had no 'proof' of the PE beyond the fact that we had shot holes in their AP until they acquiesced to PE.

I’m predicting that people sitting on the sidelines due to rate volatility over the past year will realize that waiting is futile and will stop sitting on their hands.

I think the threat of lawsuits, and perhaps the realization that they're out of their league, is starting to hit home.

Even if you rent at a break even or slight loss, if you could have 3 years of rental income offsetting your mortgage while realizing 3-6% appreciation, could be worth it, especially if you think appreciating for this area will exceed national averages.

And for example there was a Crowd Street deal (Nightingle) where the sponsor omitted losses from their claimed track record (and ultimately was fraud...they never even bought the claimed property).And there appeared to be some difficulty or confusion with obtaining the full and complete track record ( including both realized and unrealized deals).

I realize this thread is over a year old, but I actually stumbled upon it recently while digging into some 1031 exchange research on Google.

People will start to realize that a law designed to protect against criminal international money laundering captures more innocents than anything.