I'd bet on Austin over 30 years, but again, not necessarily relative to SFO. 

The owner needs to know you are solid, a good bet.

Sounds like their combined income likely beats your other tenants.Your gut is probably your best bet and you need to go with it. 

I am betting a lot of media is going to be coming out of how under insured people were because to be fully covered was "too expensive".

The Midwest is probably your best bet for a number of reasons.

If you kept the property, and accumulated the CF/yr, it would take you 25 years to get that same equity that's sitting, frozen in your property.Also, if you cashed out and used that same equity as a DP on different RE, at 20% DP, that equity would buy you $2M in PV, not just $700k,...and, I'd be willing to bet, you could find new RE that would have a yearly CF well over $20k/year.On top of that (remembering my initial statement above), any appreciation applied would be applied to $2M, not just $700k. 

These are big money plays life changing profits but RISK you bet..

Betting on future price appreciation and equity growth is just that "betting". 

Your best bet would be to find a portfolio lender whose niche aligns with your investment strategy. 

I bet people will not be getting paid their dividends very soon.