I'm leaning more towards tax at this point because I think it would serve as more of an asset not only to my own future investment/business strategies, but to other investors' strategies as well.As of right now, I don't want to be an accountant for the rest of my career; however, I know by gaining experience in a firm that works with the real estate industry I'd be able to absorb knowledge about different types of real estate, investment strategies, and their tax implications.I fell in love with real estate investing because of the challenges, risks, rewards, and opportunities it can create.

., to bring in $1 under the Fair Tax for every $1 in current embedded taxes), the tax would have to be greater than 30% (tax exclusive) on every purchase.Despite the higher income each person would generate, the exorbitant tax on each purchase would likely reduce discretionary spending; on top of that, you'd have double taxation in many circumstances -- for example, when you buy a house, you'd pay a 30% tax and then pay another 30% tax on your mortgage interest payments.Personally, I don't mind the Fair Tax, as it ultimately plays out as a regressive tax.

We fought a Revolution with England due to taxation without representation.

In my book, it is double taxation.

The nature of taxation on a gain has nothing to do with whether you had a loan or where the loan was obtained.

The C-Corp, unfortunately, incurs the "double taxation" problem (money is taxed when the C-Corp earns it, and again when it's paid to you as income).

LLC's are not recognized by the CRA and can lead to double taxation.

Not all hedge funds are the same in taxation because not all funds are structurally the same in setup.

Don't forget to figure in sale tax (at least in this state) when you purchase and the cost of the parts, even if you do the work yourself.

(There would also be no double taxation of sale or liquidation of said property because the C-Corp never owns or has the deed to the property).So if everything written above is correct, we can then say that the tax obligations (on both rent income and capital gain) are the same as what it would be under the traditional alternative (simply using a pass-through entity).If this is indeed the case, are there any benefits to be reaped from operating under a C-Corp in this manner?