data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3d39/a3d39d22752dc19b53595ed17c874475403cda44" alt=""
12 August 2024 | 26 replies
And this would be attractive because if they have cash laying around, you'll give them a better return than it's making in a savings account, CD, etc.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/106c7/106c71bd6e98181aa06f11402422332e381579a2" alt=""
10 August 2024 | 10 replies
Usually, provided all the units are attractive, you would probably get more total rent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3147/d3147160323d260bf6dbeb657b48857a17ed080c" alt=""
10 August 2024 | 14 replies
I'm a new RE investor in general and my intention was to shop around here if anyone is wiling to offer a better rate than my current one.I mean no harm/offense to any lenders out here, but I thought it would be a 'fun' post to do to attract some attention and traffic.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/812eb/812ebc1aefe2896199abc17fb456c71acc17aada" alt=""
9 August 2024 | 11 replies
Probably not.Consider adding amenities to attract guests and raise your prices to fit that level of quality, but keep your guests number limited to less.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3607f/3607fd2eeebe426d33f8d1ed0f255df8b8a2db2a" alt=""
19 August 2024 | 3705 replies
The research, vetting tenants, property management, repairs already done, etc. is attractive to a 1st time Rental investor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9ea3/d9ea34ef1340dc2f0d0c7af720f03dc1c2b3ac63" alt=""
9 August 2024 | 19 replies
You can get by with just one, but 2+ is certainly attractive to renters, particularly short-term guests.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6ea6/f6ea6ec3588705e48dc5dee920814016be1cea5e" alt=""
8 August 2024 | 4 replies
For such a community, I think pickleball courts, walking paths, and dock access to local waterways would serve as enough incentive to attract homebuyers but not incur high HOA/increases to retail price.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcfc1/fcfc1cf5fe5344610dac1c93f8aea542de93e3ae" alt=""
8 August 2024 | 6 replies
I'd love to get your feedback on which option you think is more attractive and why.Option 1: Equity Partnership- Target Properties: Single-family homes, multifamily properties, and land for development in prime locations.- Investment Term: 5 years - 10 years- Equity Split: Investor 80% / Sponsor 20%.- Preferred Return: 8% annually to the investor.- Profit Sharing: After the preferred return, profits are split 70% to the investor and 30% to the sponsor.- Management Fees: 2% of gross rental income annually.- Acquisition Fee: 2% of the purchase price.- Disposition Fee: 1% of the sale price.Option 2: Debt Financing with Equity Upside- Target Properties: Single-family homes, multifamily properties, and land for development in prime locations.- Interest Rate: 6% interest only for a term of 5 to 10 years- Prepayment Penalty: 2% if the loan is paid within the first 3 years- Equity Upside: Investor receives 30% equity of the appreciationWhich option do you think is more attractive and why?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a9b0/0a9b0b4eba0a763b9e1b176f2d3010314cbba04c" alt=""
9 August 2024 | 16 replies
The less attractive view and smaller units get very close to your example numbers and sell all the time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/710b5/710b5de662f176f5591396c2dae04af70fa9b489" alt=""
15 August 2024 | 86 replies
For one, they'll attract better quality tenants, which makes vacancies, tenant turns, servicing your debt a lot more likely and less variance to when you go to lower or middle class tenants.