There are new laws being implememented in some states as well.Hey Ken, I agree with you on people doing business the wrong way, just like in the creative side with people not properly disclosing how liable the seller is in a sub-to transaction.There are indeed people promoting a property instead of the contract, which they do not have the right to do so.

You could state to the eviction judge that you discovered material misrepresentations on her application.

Obviously aside from minor material cost savings the biggest reason is to save labor on all of the cutting in, which I feel would likely be moot with 3 sheens.

There are currently 9,000 properties listed in Lee and Collier counties and 2,000 or 22% took prices drops in the last 7 day alone.Adam -- I'm in the process of building on the Cape and for the newly permitted builds, I've noticed pricing is coming down on key building materials - roof trusses, windows/doors, shell pricing, etc.  

Owner doesn't have to explain why they are deciding to supply the materials.

Well besides the hard costs (construction, materials) and soft costs (permitting, architecture, fees, engineering) people often forget holding costs. 

So far looks like only premium accounts are promoted and there is no way to see all the agents in the area.

I try to convey that in my direct marketing materials. 

Buying property for “materials” - back in the late 1970s I was a banker in Geneva, Switzerland.

Things that penciled years ago likely wont pencil now with increased rates on holding / labor / material costs.