After all, with rentals the name is always subject to change. 

I'm not there yet.If you have any better resources on this subject let me know.Hope you all are well.

Notably it is common for investors with sufficient equity for a $250-500k HELOC to have low or no first lien balances on the subject property.Furthermore on the target purchase, investors could theoretically have more buyer leverage as a 'cash' transaction and eliminate associated mortgage closing costs and have more investment options as a 'cash buyer.'

I'm a Realtor in Central Oregon and a client wants me to write a "Subject To" offer.

I am happy to see this subject is being discussed and particularly hope those just getting started take the time to read the different viewpoints.

It is a fair start though, but I also like to have a map view to see if there are glaring value changes based on location from the subject. * 6 month comps - this is usually a good rule of thumb in a typical stable market, but can be somewhat confusing in a faster moving market.

He teaches great mf interesting class and, lik we RE mentor, his subjects work with each other with help and coaching from Anthony personally.

This subject has been discussed many times on BP, in blogs, posts, etc.

Even if you create a non-CA LLC, if you are managing the business from California, you will likely be deemed to be "doing business" in California and therefore likely subject to CA taxes.

A ethical investor who discloses the pro's & con's of subject to transaction could be a win win for both.