So the moral of the story might be...Deals do not have to make sense to make dollars.

Perhaps they'd rather these "unfit" mothers get some morality (which libs have made "relative") and accept some responsibility for their actions That wasn't one of the two alternatives I suggested...

There you have it: Deflation with an increasing money supply.The moral of the story?

That’s not what I am debating.The question is – Do you have a moral and ethical responsibility to honor your agreements?

But, if he was working for me in the private sector, I am afraid I would have had to fire him for his morals.

Now knowledge is key of course, BUT real knowledge is what happens from applying these techniques we spend so long learning about.While this may have seemed to go a little off topic, rest assured there is a moral.

Investors and licensees don't really have the same goals, so I can't see a real comparison.Curt, it would be nice if your moral convictions in business were shared equally with your peers, but that's not reality.

Agreed…Build to sell instead of build to keep always creates a moral hazardc.

Warning: I am about to pose a question about something that is not legal.If you have never broken a rule in your life and your level of personal morality cannot handle that please look away, and this is not meant to offend anyone, nor is it meant to suggest anyone do anything illegal.

That would eliminate the moral hazard that is implicit to the whole process.The truth is that the whole system is set up to protect the interests of THE AGENT.