Hello everyone,I found a fix-and-flip deal where all the numbers look good except for the fact that I don't qualify for the loan due to not meeting liquidity requirements.

The builder is just leveraged to the point that he cannot afford to turn his n the power and he needs to liquidate the property.  

I have no idea what the cost would be for some sort of them spraying stuff all over the place, but it might be a small expense compared to losing a valuable tenant.

I fact PPI, the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, popped up last month, and both CPI and PPI have been resilient in the face of the fastest interest rate increases in history and Quantitative Tightening, where the Fed stops buying corporate and government debt to reduce liquidity in the economy and slow financial markets.

Liquidity is nice but if it is debt in nature it is a double edged sword.  

It is very liquid and you have zero tenant troubles.

I have a few hundred K liquid right now and I'm leaning towards doubling down on Sacramento real estate instead of diversifying to other markets, at least for the time being. 

Internal Revenue Code, unless their taxpayer guardian resides in the same unit.Property Ownership: Individuals or households that own real property are not eligible to occupy or lease the Affordable ADU.Liquid Asset Limitation: Eligibility is restricted to persons or households whose liquid assets do not exceed 110% of the annual Area Median Income.

To which I say, but OP needs to keep his capital liquid.  

I have however helped dozens of clients who have had to deal with their policies not being liquid, being charged 5 or 6 figures a year in fees, dealing with the tax implications of surrender fees, and almost unanimously nobody has understood what they were sold.As someone who is such a champion of these ideas, I'm hopeful you have some examples for all of us in this forum who would like to learn more.