For examine if you're a previous arson investigator or fire chief and the property is a burnout I would expect your value to the venture to be more essential to it's success and therefore would command a higher share of the deal's proceeds.

I just pass my real estate exam in California.

https://www.realpage.com/analytics/high-rise-v-garden-style-examining-the-path-to-prosperity/2/

As a former real estate lawyer, with a lot of experience in regulation implementation and working with regulators, I will advise you to examine deals positioned in an OppZone very carefully.

I would really try to toss the Operation Agreement to your individual CPAs to examine and determine ahead of time.

I just passed the licence exam in IL and have started my search to hang my licence. 

Looking at the regular monthly inflows/outflows is nice to use as a rule of thumb guide, when doing some kind of initial back-of-the-envelope examination... a bit like the 1% rule or 50% rule.But clearly there is a lot more to it than just a simple look at inflows minus outflows.  

If they say yes, you could ask them straight up if they've ever actually examined the person.

In some states under certain conditions it's illegal to do so, for examine, turning off tenant's gas or electric in the middle of winter in Minnesota, to my understanding, could get you in trouble.

They think its "OK" to not make the profit planned for when the project is first examined, i.e. they think failure is OK.