That is a WIN, WIN, WIN for the buyer, seller and agent.Now admittedly the stars have to align pretty well for this to come up (Doesn't take to much bigger of a discrepancy for the kickback to not be worth it for the agent to do the extra work) but there IS some added flexibility with less people at the till.However since it is unlikely it will work out like this keep the agent if you think they have done a good job and you need some guidance still.

But then you have Satan who is the great deciever who is powerful and duplicates most if not all of what God has done, and in his works you find discrepancies and lies and IMO all the false religions that there are.

Let me reply to what you think is a discrepancy in a previous post.

I have been following a piece of property for a couple of weeks and through analyzing the tax records there is a discrepancy in rooms.

Yet, on this video in particular said he wouldn't do 1+ million dollar deal over 25,000 discrepancy... 

I am not sure of the legal language to use but you need to inform them that their application was rejected due to unresolved discrepancies in the information provided by the applicants.I doubt they would challenge it further beyond that because they will know you found out about the eviction.

Many times we had problems with discrepancies in quantities and prices, therefore I had to decide on what would I do.

Certainly enough there for a lender to tell your purchasing power, and if after you provide the paperwork there is a discrepancy it would be super easy/quick to identify it.

We will then decide if we will repair the items or provide a written explanation of why we are not -- for example, chip in counter, cosmetic only, will add it to list of discrepancies tenant will not be responsible for at end of lease term. 

I also would create a new contract and have them sign that so in the event there is a discrepancy in the future, you have something in writing.