I do disagree.

I also disagree with Jason here.

I don't disagree with what you are saying.

Agree or Disagree?

I really do not understand this opinion and disagree with it.

good luck*edit* also, you may want to offer them 80 on the first round, so that there is room to negotiate up to 87,900 as Jon outlined for you... everyone always want to feel like negotiating is some big compromise and that both sides gave something. others may disagree with this, but it's just my personal opinion.as a digression, while working at a law firm I once saw a case where the opposing client had nothing and I mean NOTHING going for him but was trying to settle. so the lawyers came up with a figure and he suggested a lower amount, to which they of course said no. it turned into a huge argument and all he kept saying was that "in the spirit of negotiation" they should come down a little so that both parties would have conceded something.

I rarely disagree with you, but one of the things I find most annoying is opening up someone's MySpace page and hearing some blasted crappy music.Adding music would just be asking for headaches galore for me and many others.I'm not willing to have others suffer for your Deliverance moment ;)That and . . . it just doesn't work, IMO.

However, I do disagree about there not being a single calculation that determines whether a commercial property is acceptable.

Tyler,I'm going to have to disagree with Mike on this one.

Where I disagree is that "if the investor's intent is to hold the rental property indefinitely, the depreciation approach is irrelevant because it all works out the same in the long run."