![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/484339/small_1694883266-avatar-gregg44.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
20 June 2016 | 17 replies
Now they are mostly buying A - B asset.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/86278/small_1621416251-avatar-allendehl.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 February 2016 | 3 replies
I'll implement in a A/B testing and see if that makes the difference.
15 November 2017 | 28 replies
Im a B/H guy but flipping seems like the way of the future...Love the ideas and feedback!
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/383097/small_1621448071-avatar-claywalker.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
20 July 2016 | 8 replies
Where I live, you barely can find a SFH on a tiny lot in a B- to C neighborhood for that amount.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/492453/small_1621479111-avatar-danielz8.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 March 2016 | 5 replies
Definitely a good source for the AB REI market.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/185386/small_1694756723-avatar-danguerrav.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
29 February 2016 | 3 replies
I would really appreciate it if you could provide some insight with regards to the following scenario.In year one GP has 20% equity and Limited Partners A,B,C,D have the following interest in the property's equity.A: 20%B: 20%C: 30%D: 10%If the operating agreement states that after payback of principal the equity split will convert into 50/50 would the Limited Partner's individual interest compress equally?
2 March 2016 | 20 replies
I would say it is a B to a C area, but the streets are very walkable and I feel comfortable going through that neighborhood.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/485247/small_1621478779-avatar-elenaj.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
2 March 2016 | 37 replies
Tub was cracked due to not being supported. 2) No access panel required by code for the pump, the pump was in the rear of the tub buried under the tub deck. 3) No thermostatic anti-scaled mixing valve required by code for the roman tub filler 4) No dedicated circuit for the pump required by the manufacturer, the electrical for the tub was piggy backed on the vanity lights 5) no GFCI protection on the tub as required by code 6) no grounding of the tub motor as required by code 7) ABS drain glued to PVC drain pipe with ABS glue 8) the tub valve connections uried with no access were IPS threaded stainless steel flexible water lines instead of hard sweated copper connections, (lost count on all the shark bites they used, they must buy them in bulk) 9) all the tile was tiled directly on the plywood of the tub deck, no underlayment to prevent the tile from being popped and the grout cracking from moisture getting to the plywood...the list goes on and on.. oh and the tub filler valve was located on the back side of the tub, not a code violation but certainly not user friendly for somebody to have to climb basically into the tub or over it to turn the water on, but that's minor in the scope of all the code violations and poor workmanship, that's just poor design.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/361223/small_1621446622-avatar-clevelandp.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
3 March 2016 | 3 replies
AB-BC closings... you actually close the deal using transactional funding and resell the property to the end buyer in the same day...