I do wonder what the statue of limitations would be on this issue.

For instance, you wouldn't put expensive marble kitchen counters in a rental (unless the market supports doing so.)

if it’s your property then I don’t see why not but if you have tenants there might be some statues against it.

No cultured marble since it scratches easily.LED lighting everywhere.Use a dark grout and use a grout sealer like Boost.

Hey @Scott Brown ,Here's the 2017 MN Statues rules on it...https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/504B/pdf504B.271 TENANT'S PERSONAL PROPERTY REMAINING IN PREMISESIt's too lengthy and detailed to post here, but copy the above line, go to that website (revisor) and scroll down to page 28 (of 52) and all your questions should be answered.

Fremont is where the solstice naked bikers ride, a statue of Lenin stands, (and yes, Lenin would have slaughtered everyone in Fremont for thinking differently than he, so go figure why they would honor such a villain), and it's where the troll (sculpture) lives under the bridge.

Considering both the Full Faith and Credit Clause as well as the Supremacy Clause, this was both predictable and expected.ASSET PROTECTION SUMMARY:From an Asset Protection standpoint, this case has one very big point – You cannot rely on the DAPT statue of any State, nor the Trust document or recitals to establish JURISDICTION!

Just so you know, if your operating agreement is silent on any of the issue you are concerned about, the State's Statue will take over.

Insurance premiums vary widely by state as laws affecting liability, statue of limitations varies by state, so you can sue someone for something in one state, but not another. 

I know I should not say that as things still bite me in my marble sculpted butt....