This does not imply that this purchase is not a home run in this market.  

Tenants have a right of use and enjoyment of the premises, so that would imply that the landlord cannot interfere with the lease premises.

Investing by nature implies there is a risk of loss like this.

You need to be looking for "motivated sellers".These 2 things are not the same and one ABSOLUTELY does NOT imply the other.Understand the difference and you will be far more successful, becoming successful!

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by that, but this implies there is a right and wrong. 

They rather burn the house to the ground than sell it.I do agree that the data would imply an increase in motivation, but not by much (at all).To really understand this understand the definition a motivated seller.A motivated seller is not someone who becomes willing to sell their house!

Note rent control raises risk that results in the need for increased revenue which implies large rent growth.  

The aforementioned Trainers used me because we actually performed.

We both can happily part our ways under free market conditions.But the second part of your post implies that all sellers are idiots, or that I (or State) is a nanny that must make decisions for mentally deranged sellers , all of whom have an IQ of 10 years old child.

I believe the Carls are upstanding and honest contributors, and as such deserve any  criticism to be direct and not as a “snide” remark or implied “put down”.