The issue in most instances is the inability to articulate the risks and how these structures will actually help and therein lies the issue and why most go over the top on asset protection expenditures.

I know all are so used to campaign promises just being a slogan of lies but this is a factual thing, we know they are actually do what they say they will do, or at least try like hell to do it. 

What they could have done better is referred me to a better PM, who actually does better work, they could have helped me in analyze the property better, they could have atleast helped me get a property which does not loose value over time but gains it(which they clearly lied to me about).

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't trying to think of other, potentially more lucrative and less risky ways of doing something similar though.I guess I've always known that part of the benefit of real estate was time arbitrage, but this is making me see it more clearly and in an entirely new way.

@Jay Check Are you a real account or is this just another promotion for a lying guru?

Can't lie...

Your tenant telling you the boyfriend did it might be lying.

Promissory loan notes are “secured” by Norada Capital Management where, in our taped call, is a $120 million-dollar public company with $70 million in owed loan notes to investors and $50 million in “equity” which is all a lie. d

But, that aside, I’d like to initiate a discussion of where note investors feel the opportunities will lie moving forward.I’ll go first.  

NOT A SINGLE state has a water delivery system to combat fires and condition's of this magnitudeStop listening to all the blatant misinformation being dumped in SM and certain "news" stations....99% of it is complete BS and been disproven, but the lies just keep spreading as "fact"Give me a  F'in break....... now all the RE experts are fire management experts"CA ran out of water...... do you have ANY clue what kind of water delivery system would be needed to handle multiple wild fires of this magnitude?...."