The United States is litigation crazy and people are always looking for any excuse to sue someone who they perceive has "extra" money.

Not because it is perceived as an easy start or there is less risk involved, but because my cash flow is limited.

Discrimination, whether perceived or real, is a real threat to landlords in this scenario.

If you are calling out "problems" that are generally normal issues, you may be perceived as a buyer that will drag out a closing and ask for unreasonable concessions. 

It seems to me that if your father-in-law is as big of a fish as you say, then he is testing you to see if you rise to the challenge and are worthy of the empire he's built or if you cower from an unbelievable opportunity because of a perceived short-term gain of only $1200 per month.What type of properties are these?

There's no suit color darker than black, and (perception again) the darker the suit color the perceived greater level of power.

The fees and expenses outweigh any perceived interest in the cash value of your policy.

What a lot of investors fail to see is that simply paying the right people to do the job the right way in the first place has a lot of benefits and may not always have as high of a cost as you are perceiving. 

Three things currently keep folks in stocks rather than everyone piling into REI: the ease, the liquidity, and the perceived risk.

I found it listed for rent and so far all I know is that they have been toying with the idea of selling.Some of my perceived bargaining chips: I am a mortgage Loan Officer so it will close quick, easy, and I can give him a killer deal for his next purchase if he is looking to buy again I can save him money not using an agent (I have one, but I found this on my own so not sure where he may come in on this)What other advantages am I not thinking of?