data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa13b/aa13b941cb3bc2024de20d1a774f99b48e17a455" alt=""
27 September 2014 | 7 replies
If it cannot be restored to its original condition then I would dock their SD or charge the rental account.Of course, that is my interpretation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85b00/85b00ff213071921628dadf0704508959762f931" alt=""
28 December 2008 | 18 replies
If I fix the problem on my own, I can not charge for my own labor.By extension, I also interpret that to mean that even if I outsource the repair work, I can not add a "supervisory fee" and mark up the charge to the tenant.Let us know what your attorney says.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbc42/bbc4227cf4accd75c270749dac26a047fe2bb01a" alt=""
31 July 2009 | 70 replies
Wow, this is really scary...This is one of the most illogical discussions I've had here, and I don't know what to make of it (after some seemingly logical discussions with you in the past).If you want to believe something is true because of a single Internet forum post and an illogical interpretation of cause and effect from a newspaper article, I guess I shouldn't bother arguing.Sorry, I can't have this discussion anymore.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd90b/fd90b060a0417eea20d359ba02a341c9ad7f269e" alt=""
23 February 2014 | 3 replies
I think you are confused because you are interpreting the denominator in the formula you provided as "Purchase Price".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d5a/71d5ae9613141d5eddc405bef66d22d46449d593" alt=""
28 October 2010 | 50 replies
Oh I almost forgot liberals interpret the Constitution and us Conservatives take it literally and totally believe in its strength and infinite wisdom.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49bb3/49bb378db5883678013baa6a14daee82866b1323" alt=""
11 December 2017 | 62 replies
src=/program_offices/housing/rmra/safe/sfea You can view the act itself by clicking the first link "SAFE mortgage licensing act"Here's the HUD site that interprets the act and lays things out a little more clearly:http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/ramh/safe/smlicact.cfmYou can see in section B where it defines who all is not required to be an RMLO under the SAFE act.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8ead/b8ead7a954164cfe6f28b54c4aa2e1b25ef840b4" alt=""
25 July 2013 | 22 replies
They pass judgment of the interpretation of the law and how it applies to your business venture - sometimes the final judgment.Including them is a critical part of success.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/666a3/666a3d50565da0ea918d04946d7c9ce2e6e476b1" alt=""
8 June 2015 | 48 replies
I am not sure anyone is drinking kool aid;) I understand you are interpreting this thread that way but I don't see any post being unrealistic.
24 April 2015 | 15 replies
At least that is how I interpreted it!.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6480f/6480fea4480a62768ab76d57ac9ae9c9935f7ffb" alt=""
18 December 2017 | 11 replies
Louis is different than Jeff City, Springfield or K.C. all real estate is local, meaning the interpretation of regulatory matters can be different, St.