The gains in these transactions are not capital in nature.

So investment properties that are commercial in nature (think office buildings, retail strip centers, etc.) cannot use DSCR loans.

If so, is it seen as a risk due to localized natural causes?

I’m a top operator and really understand the business from start to finished product to managing them well so I’m going to be able to push higher returns naturally than my competition.  

Liquidity is nice but if it is debt in nature it is a double edged sword.  

Naturally, owners didn’t want their expensive planes sitting outside in the weather.

The loan is listed as being in payment default with interestpayments capitalized.The Cyclone portfolio lists the original borrower as various entities we believe to be subsidiaries of CycloneInvestment Group, headed by Aaron Eichorn and Charles Aryeh who appears to have used a relative, Chiya Aryehas a sponsor for the loans.We note that Trustee data sponsor and borrower data for earlier CLOs is inconsistent, and the nature of the loanbook is such that properties can be swapped in and out over time.

If you have no experience at this price range I think you are drawing dead on financing given the extensive/complicated/lengthy nature of the project.

Due to the passive nature DSTs are not meant for every investor and it is important to seek education to see if a DST is best suitable for you. 

I'm naturalized Toledoian now mate hehe