However, My guess is that there is probably a way to make it work through some restructuring or a ground lease structure to a new entity (given the leasing rules under the recent set of proposed regulations).

We do have a lawyer lined up who should be able to take care of that aspect, so that's good to know.In terms of the structure you proposed, I just have a couple follow up questions to make sure I understand properly:1) If the investor pays us $50,000, we would offer to pay him a preferred return of $3,000 per year from the monthly income we receive?

Then propose seller carry back financing as a solution to the seller.

The solution to the problem proposed simply moves toward more centralization of power to the State.

Put together a proper proposal for the bank and they will work with you.

I'm in a similar situation as well and would appreciate hearing what options you propose as well @Nghi.

In the chapter on wholesaling, he states that many wholesalers include detailed bids from contractors in their proposals to potential cash buyers.

However, paying attention to your surrounding communities and the proposals that are being thrown back and forth can always lead to some ideas; as well as, give you better understanding if plans look to be moving forward.

They both insist that there are creative ways to structure this deal so that me and my mother can LEGALLY , and secured by CONRACT, be able to collect the net proceeds, and split it 50/50 as her and I agreed from the start.One of the proposed arrangements I researched and sought legal consul for, and am fairly certain would in fact still be an act of fraud.A broker brought in an investor who proposed the idea of purchasing the Mortgage Note, and giving us the difference, secured of course in advance by a contract where we would agree to forfeit the Security(house) once the note was purchased. 

That would include all of your outstanding monthly payments that show up on your credit report, including a proposed housing payment versus your total income.